Gov. DeSantis Wants to Bring Back the Poll-Tax: What does the 2020 Election looks like for people previously convicted of a felony in Florida?

Gov. DeSantis Wants to Bring Back the Poll-Tax: What does the 2020 Election looks like for people previously convicted of a felony in Florida?

What does the 2020 Election look like for people previously convicted of a felony in Florida?

With the 2020 election ever-more-closely approaching, voter registration and disenfranchisement issues have been brought into the spotlight. Specifically in Florida, the reestablishment of voting rights for people who have previously been convicted of a felony has come into question as citizens get ready to cast their ballots.


Felon disenfranchisement has applied to all people convicted of felonies in Florida, no matter the type of crime they committed, ever since the founding of the state Constitution. In the U.S., felony disenfranchisement is the revocation of someone’s right to vote due to a conviction of a felony criminal offense. 


The first big change to Florida’s law came in 2007, when felons were able to appear before a Parole Committee who would determine whether or not their right to vote would be reinstated. 


In 2018, an overwhelming number of Floridians voted for Amendment 4 (The Voting Rights Restoration for Felons Initiative), a ballot initiative that automatically restored voting rights to most people convicted of a felony upon completion of all terms of their sentence. This amendment put an end to the lifetime ban from the polls for people who previously had lost all their voting rights. This amendment applied to almost all people convicted of felonies, except those convicted of murder or felony sex offenses.


The passing of the amendment seemed like a success for the 1.4 million people who would now be added to the voting pool in Florida. The amendment was bipartisan, and it would help change the fact that more than one in five black Floridans were ineligible to vote due to a criminal conviction.


The amendment was considered a win. People thought it solved the issue of felon disenfranchisement.


But there was a big problem. 


People previously convicted of felonies quickly ran into problems when they tried to exercise their civic duty. After passing the amendment, the Florida state legislature passed an additional law. The law required people previously convicted of a felony to pay all fees and retributions to the courts related to their convictions — before they could cast a single ballot. 


While this seems like a modern-day poll tax (already abolished by the 24th Amendment), the law was made legal due to a single caveat. The courts which convicted people were given the power to modify a person’s criminal sentence, in order to waive or lower the fees due. 


In addition to the fact that many people convicted of a felony cannot afford to pay the restitution fees they owe, Florida does not retain any sort of system that keeps track of felons’ debts. A majority of people convicted of a felony do not know how much money they owe, and therefore have a harder time trying to determine how much they need to pay. 


Because of the exceptions to the new law, there have been some issues already circulating in court in order to dissolve these problems before the 2020 election. 


On Feb. 19, a United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit heard a case brought by 17 indigent ex-felons who all argued that their right to vote should not be decided by their financial stability nor financial status. The court ruled that the state has a right to collect the fees owed by people, but that those who cannot afford them cannot be disenfranchised. The case went to a trial court in April to decide whether or not this law could be labeled a poll tax, which would make it unconstitutional. 


“‘We conclude that the phrase, when read and understood in context, plainly refers to obligations and includes ‘all’ — not some — LFOs [legal financial obligations] imposed in conjunction with an adjudication of guilt,’ the Justices wrote. However, the Court’s opinion does not affect the separate federal lawsuit challenging SB 7066, which is scheduled to go to trial in April,” according to the Sentencing Project. 

“Florida cannot violate the U.S. Constitution’s protections,” said a joint statement from the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, Brennan Center for Justice, and the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund shared by the Sentencing Project. “The right to vote cannot be contingent on the ability to pay. We will continue fighting in federal court for our clients and the hundreds of thousands of Floridians’ voting rights that SB7066 seeks to unconstitutionally and permanently eliminate.”


At the April trial, a judge ruled the law requiring people previously convicted of felonies to pay all fees and retributions before they could vote was unconstitutional. In short, the judge agreed that the fees were a modern-day poll tax for Floridians.

But now, there is a new problem. Gov. DeSantis wants to bring the poll tax back.

DeSantis plans to appeal the Amendment 4 ruling that allows ex felons to vote, the Orlando Sentinel reported May 26.

DeSantis’ announcement came only 2 days after US District Court Judge Robert Hinkle ruled Florida’s 2019 law to install Amendment 4 “was unconstitutional because it required felons to pay restitution, fines and fees before being able to vote,” according to the Orlando Sentinel. Hinkle called the law a “pay-to-vote system” and he also noted the difficulty in finding out how much a felon might owe.

What DeSantis’ appeal will do is send the decision to the 11th Circuit – the Atlanta-based appellate court – for a ruling. His goal is to reverse Judge Hinkle’s decision which struck down the law requiring fines and fees to be payed by people previously convicted of felonies in order to regain the right to vote.

If DeSantis is successful in getting the decision appealed, people previously convicted of a felony would need to find a way to track how much money they owe the court and schedule an appearance to see if their fees could be waived. If not, then people would need to pay all the court fees in order to vote in both the primary and general election.

Do you think a modern-day poll tax should be allowed in Florida?


Reach out today to learn more about protecting yourself and your right to vote, or to schedule a free criminal or DUI defense strategy session with Rossen Law Firm.


  • Fort Lauderdale Office: 754-206-6200
  • Sunrise Office:  754-999-2499
  • Boca Raton Office: 561-880-8181
Second DUI, 0.19 Breath
DUI Charge Dismissed
Federal Child Porn Possession
Mandatory Prison Time Avoided
Attempted Murder
Charges Dismissed
How We Win
Second DUI, 0.19 Breath
DUI Charge Dismissed
Federal Child Porn Possession
Mandatory Prison Time Avoided
Attempted Murder
Charges Dismissed
Google Reviews
kevin tabronkevin tabron
00:07 08 Sep 22
In one of the most stressful times in my life, Rossen Law Firm was there for me. Leaving no stone unturned they provided patience and knowledge in every detail of my case. I’m very thankful and proud of this law firm family and especially of my lawyer, Scott Simmons for guiding, defending and helping me in every way possible. He and this law firm family come highly recommended from personal experience!!!
Jason HigleyJason Higley
15:24 26 Aug 22
I had an unfortunate situation with a family member that lead to my arrest and being charged with DV Battery. This was the first time I had ever been arrested so I was very nervous and afraid of what was going to happen to me. After talking with Adam I decided to retain him and let me tell you this was the BEST decision I could have ever made. Adam made me feel so comfortable and confident that everything will turn out the best in my favor. He is professional, ethical and supportive. He was always available too answer any questions or concerns.Not to mention, his team at the office is awesome they are so friendly and welcoming. Anytime I had a question when I called the office they were able to guide me in the rightdirection. They always were in contact with me with any information or updates regarding my case. Adams team is GREAT!Adam delivered, my case was DISMISSED. So if you want an attorney the is gonna fight for you and get the job done retain the BEST there is Adam Rossen!!!
Felix I HFelix I H
13:27 28 Jul 22
Adam Rossen and the team at Rossen Law took great care in handling my case. They are very professional, and get the job done. I was particular relieved to see just how much empathy they showed with me, and how effortless it was to be their client.I literally visited them twice. My initial consultation, and then to pickup the final docs. I have nothing but great things to say about these folks, and I would highly recommend them to anyone. Thanks Guys.
Terry ChristopherTerry Christopher
12:32 09 May 22
I had an amazing experience with The Rossen Law Firm. The staff were very professional. Attorney Susan Lawson went above and beyond working on my case. We were thoroughly prepared for trial. Mrs. Lawson reviewed hours of body and dash camera footage multiple times and aggressively performed depositions on witnesses and law enforcement.The final outcome for me was the state dropped my case, due to the great work Susan and the Rossen team performed. I didn’t even need to go to trial.This law firm does not play around. They pay attention to detail and they FIGHT FOR YOU!Thank you Adam, team, and a special thank you to Susan for your amazing work! I really appreciate you.
Ketiana ProvinceKetiana Province
20:27 23 Mar 22
My experience with Rossen Law Firm was excellent. From the consultation to the end.. My attorney Susan Lawson gave my son's case all the time and attention that was needed to be successful in court. She was confident during all the court proceedings. My favorite part was when she said we are family, never once my son and I were treated other then that. I very much appreciate the knowledge and support I received through Rossen Law Firm.